An interesting bit of today in my reading.
The Rev. Dr. Michael Foss recently began his pastorship at my church, and we're currently reading through one of the books he's written as a staff. is about how (protestant) churches need to switch from a member model of church to a discipleship model, and lays the groundwork for how to get from the former to the latter. In the first chapter, Foss says this:
"Perhaps the greatest weakness of the [member] model has been the loss, over time, of its vision for the mission of the church -- a mission that can be characterized quite simply as participation in God's love in Jesus Christ for the world... What we need to communicate to those outside the church is radical openness to all, an openness extended from a position of strong, vibrant self-identity as followers of Christ and participants in God's love for the world. That's what the discipleship model gives us." (16, 20)
Today James K. A. Smith, the author of (among ), announced on his blog that's , Desiring the Kingdom: Worship, Worldview and Cultural Formation. In the post he gives an abstract of the book, in which he says:
"In particular, I'm pressing the limits, even distortions, that attend 'worldview'-talk which tends to now dominate Christian higher education. Such worldviewism, I suggest, continues to reduce Christianity to an intellectual system that can be grapsed apart from the church and is then 'taught' as information to be merely transferred from one head to another. In contrast, I argue that Christian discipleship is a matter of formation, not mere information -- and that 'Christian' education should be fundamentally a matter of shaping our love, our desire, to be oriented to the shape of the kingdom of God. And such formation happens not primarily via the heady, cognitive 'lectures' (whether in our Protestant sermon factories or our Christian college classrooms) but through embodied practices that seep into our imagination and get hold of our gut, our heart, our kardia."
Although Foss' message is directed to those in the church and Smith's is more far-reaching, I think they're both essentially asserting the same point. So what do you think? Do you agree with Foss and Smith? Disagree? Leave a comment below and let me know!





