Obama and evangelicals: Summer of love


I’ve had this post sitting in “draft” status for a while, but when I saw Shane Claiborne on the front page of CNN.com (pictured above) with the headline Young Evangelicals not a lock for Republicans, I was pushed over the edge (HT: Aaron Alexander via Twitter).

A few weeks ago, I wrote a post called Are evangelicals abandoning their political agenda? (which was featured on Reuters) in which I said “Perhaps it’s getting harder to hear the rally cries [of the Right] because John McCain is a stupendously weak GOP candidate who doesn’t really push the traditional evangelical agenda. Or perhaps it’s because Barack Obama is really the uniter who he has promised to be, erasing generations-old lines in the sand.” Since publishing that post, it seems like that argument is all that I read about. Below you’ll find several articles that present a similar proposition.

Mr. Right?: The Rise of the Obamacons (The New Republic)

But you probably have not have heard of many of the Obamacons–and neither has the Obama campaign. When I checked with it to ask for a list of prominent conservative supporters, the campaign seemed genuinely unaware that such supporters even existed. But those of us on the right who pay attention to think tanks, blogs, and little magazines have watched Obama compile a coterie drawn from the movement’s most stalwart and impressive thinkers. It’s a group that will no doubt grow even larger in the coming months.

Evangelical flock strays from the Republican fold (The Observer)

Yet McCain’s problems have led to speculation about a narrowing ‘God gap’ between Republicans and Democrats. Some of Barack Obama’s aides believe they can move into the evangelical bloc and win over many of the voters that elected Bush. In Chicago last week Obama met 30 religious leaders, including the Rev TD Jakes, pastor of a Dallas mega-church. His staff also held the first fundraiser for Obama by a new group of evangelicals called the Matthew 25 Network.

Obama’s Evangelical Biographer (The New Republic)

“For Obama, faith is not simply political garb, something a focus group told him he ought to try. Instead, religion to him is transforming, lifelong, and real,” Mansfield writes.”

Obama’s Faithful (The American Conservative)

For years progressives have dreamed of getting Evangelicals to connect with anti-poverty and environmental programs. Obama may be the one to do it. As Ross says, he is just better than McCain at framing his progressive policies as part of a moral mission.

Evangelicals Are Crucial to Winning the 2008 Election (Newsweek)

Young evangelicals reflect their pastors’ diffidence. As conservative as their parents in most respects—and more conservative in opposing abortion—many young evangelicals are fatigued by the culture war (and have greater worries about $4 gas). They say they don’t want to be Republican just because that’s what’s expected.

Young Evangelicals Aim to Broaden Agenda (Washington Post)

With his tousled hair, sideburns and a scruffy “soul patch” beard, the 26-year-old New Yorker belongs to a growing minority of young evangelicals who want to broaden their political agenda beyond the traditional opposition to abortion and gay marriage. Evangelicals like Dunbar are eager to move on and tackle such hot topics as global warming and social justice.

You get the point.

A couple of observations: First, as more and more of the Obama/evangelical articles pop up, it’s beginning to all sound the same. No one is breaking any new ground. The original “Obama is attracting some evangelicals, and that’s ‘new’ in (recent) politics” is the hot election topic, so the story is being written and rewritten for myriad publications. Unfortunately, this probably means it’s all we’ll hear about for a while, and it’s all the analysts will talk about on November 4 — either way (”Are you surprised that Obama was able to pull in x% of the evangelical vote?” or “Why do you think Obama failed to bring in the evangelical vote tonight?”).

Second, although this is the hot topic, not everyone agrees with the argument. For example:

In the end, important changes surely have been afoot throughout wider evangelicalism, but neither are the most significant of these developments “recent” nor do they spell a collapse of traditional evangelical commitments in the social-political arena that equate to an exodus to the Democratic party.

What are your thought on the Obama/evangelical “summer of love”? Leave a comment and let me know. Did I miss any major stories anywhere?


Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed to have articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader. If you don't have a feed reader, you can always sign up for email updates and have fresh content delivered daily to your inbox.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

No trackbacks/pingbacks yet.

Comments

Another group of nut-cases who believe in an invisible diety in the sky.

Now, now, Pockets. If you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all.

I always enjoy your posts and I hope I don’t come off as a douche bag like Pockets. Your post highlights one of the reasons America is in such a torrid state. These stories are not news, which you alluded to at the end of your post. Whether or not Obama polls well with the born-agains, jews, atheists, hindus, or rastafarians is moot. Where are the stories on his support of FISA? His support of Isreal at the expense of the Palestines? His Chicago school economic advisors? “A change we can believe in” is all well and good, but what about “a change we can count on?” Any hoots, enough ranting.

This is such an interesting issue to me. I think it is great that some Christians around this nation have started to care important issues like healthcare and ending a horrible war and have enough integrity as a nation to say no to torture, but I am also shocked at how (dumb, brainwashed, I don’t even know how to say this nicely) some are. How in 2008 can Christians still support a party that has totally ignored the needs of the American people? How can Christians support a party that has acted so Un-Christian in our countries international affairs? While every party and every candidate has their faults, how can any American Christian continue to support the policies of the last 8 years?

Skip: I agree that they’re not news, I think I would actually use the phrase “pop news” though. It’s news that’s easy to digest; you don’t have to use your head (unfortunately) to understand polling numbers or which demographic is currently supporting/denouncing whom.

The news about the topics you mentioned is tough to find, especially on front pages, because (1) it’s not “breaking” news, and (2) it’s not pop news. Thomas Friedman had an article a while back called Obama and the Jews, but it was actually about Bush and the Jews, despite what the title suggests.

See you soon.

Ryan: Good questions, bro.

For me, the shift has resulted in two primary things…

1. Conservative republicans failed to deliver any movement on their #1 issue, abortion. They had 8 years of Bush who is very evangelical friendly, got 2 supreme court justices out of it, and no real change.

2. Republicans missed the boat on younger evangelicals shift towards social issues and the environment.

Adam: Can you explain what you mean? When you say “For me” do you mean “For a former Bush-supporting evangelical who now leans towards Obama” or something else (I don’t want to put words in your mouth…

“For me” was my recognition that this is an opinion of something I’m seeing much larger. I’m seeing a major shift/swing of young evangelical voters on those two issues. This is based on both blog land and here on the ground in Michigan. The republicans seem to have lost the interest of young evangelical voters.

As for my own vote. If GW Bush was on the ballot I’d vote for him again. He’s bought my vote fair n square.

Adam: Okay, okay. I see. I wonder what it will look like “on the ground” when you move out West. Should be interesting to have experienced both places during the election year.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)