Interview with Tony Jones, author of “The New Christians” (Part 1)
| The New Christians: Dispatches from the Emergent Frontier | ![]() |
The following is Part 1 (Part 2) of an interview with Tony Jones about his forthcoming book The New Christians: Dispatches from the Emergent Frontier (to be released March 3, 2008). Tony is the national coordinator of Emergent Village, and a doctoral fellow in practical theology at Princeton Theological Seminary. Find out more at Tony’s website.
JAKE BOUMA: Tell the readers a little about yourself – education, ministry experience, family life, etc. How did you get from baby Tony J. to the author of “The New Christians”?
TONY JONES: I grew up in Edina, Minnesota, the same town where I now reside. My parents were (are) great people who were faithful, but didn’t take their faith too seriously. And I mean that in a good way. So many of my friends in ministry grew up in homes that were spiritually toxic. Not me. My parents are highly educated, well-rounded people. They highly valued education and made sure that my brothers and I were serious about school.
We went to a great church — a funny hybrid of mainline and evangelical Protestantism, and I was very involved there growing up. I went to everything. And that church had a great stance on letting kids move into leadership positions early, so I was counseling camp and teaching Sunday school, etc., even when I was in junior high. From there I went to Dartmouth College and immediately to Fuller Seminary, a journey that I recount in my latest book (The New Christians: Dispatches from the Emergent Frontier).
After seminary, I was a missionary for three years, working primarily with Oglala Lakota people of the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. Then I took the job as minister to youth and young adults at my home church. It was there that I hooked up with Doug Pagitt and some of the other early emergent leaders. Honestly, my life hasn’t been the same since. This book is a record of our thoughts and activities over the past ten years.
JAKE BOUMA: In some of the early reviews of “The New Christians” there are already comparisons to Brian McLaren’s “A New Kind of Christian” (e.g., ysmarko). For myself (and many others), ANKOC was my first encounter with “emergent” ideas, and really resonated deep within my soul. What is your response to the comparison, and how do you see your book functioning within the grand scheme of things?
TONY JONES: Well, that’s a bit hard to tell. My book is a little history, a little philosophy, theology, and telling stories about what’s happening “on the ground” right now. Like Brian, my book is kind of one step removed from being a memoir, but there are memoir aspects to it. I guess one thing that I hope will happen is that it clears up some misconceptions about what we emergents are all about.
JAKE BOUMA: Yeah, there seem to be a lot of misconceptions about emergent-types across the board, but particularly from critics of emergent. What would you say to the critics to encourage them to read your book? What will they take away from it?
TONY JONES: Well, I think that my book will clear up a lot of misconceptions. I argue that emergents really love the Bible and spend a lot of time in the Bible, for instance, against the criticism that we don’t. I also argue that we’re all relativists — even so-called “fundamentalists” are relativists. I run into lots of people who say they’re real worried about the direction of the emergent church, and when I ask what they’ve read, they say nothing. They’ve heard “things.” Or they’ve read a blog post about emergent. I hope they’ll read this book so that at least they will be informed.
JAKE BOUMA: Are you talking about a genuinely “new” group of Christians, or are you simply articulating ways (”the third way”?) to be authentically Christian, implying deep roots in history and tradition all the way back to the primitive church? Additionally, is the title “The New Christians” a value statement in any way?
TONY JONES: It’s not a value statement, really. But I am arguing that this is part of the future of American Christianity. And, to be honest, I think it is the preferred future. I think this is the way to go; I cast my lot with these people. I think the roots of emergent go way back, of course. So when I say “new Christians,” I really mean a new way of being Christian — a way that is rooted in the past but is also uniquely postmodern.
JAKE BOUMA: The United States was at its birth seen as a spiritual frontier for Christians. How is what you’re talking about different from that time, or the Great Awakening or the Reformation? Do you see any similarities and/or differences?
TONY JONES: I think there’s a similar DNA that runs through all revivals (Benedict, Francis, Luther/Calvin), and there’s even more in common when you talk about American revivals (the Great Awakenings, Pietism, Azusa Street, seeker movement). Emergent surely shares much in common with those revivals. But we’ve also come along at a unique time in history, so things like a global economy and electronic media make our movement different as well.
Continue to Part 2 of the interview »
Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed to have articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader. If you don't have a feed reader, you can always sign up for email updates and have fresh content delivered daily to your inbox.
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
[...] 6 January, 2008 by Tony Jones …about the new book, The New Christians: Dispatches from the Emergent Frontier. You can find part one HERE. [...]
[...] been the same since. This book is a record of our thoughts and activities over the past ten years. (more…) Related PostsTony JonesTony Jones forum follow-upBlogging from the National Youth Workers [...]
Comments
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




No feed reader? No problem! Subscribe by email to receive daily updates featuring the freshest content from JakeBouma.com!













Interesting post, it is neat that you had a chance to interview him. I’m curious about his comment that “everyone is a relativist” any idea what he meant by that or how he defines relativism?
I find if funny how people try to paint all emergents with once broad bunch because the group is pretty diverse themselves. All you have to do is look at Mark Driscoll and Dan Kimball side by side with Doug Pagitt, Brian McClaren and Tony Jones to see that not everybody in the Emerging Church movement sees things in the same light.
BTW, unrelated, congrats on Obama winning. Very impressive and history making win for him. I may not agree with many of his positions, but his victory speech was brilliant and he has run a fantastic campaign. I have said before that he certainly is my favorite Democratic candidate and I appreciate his positive tone.
He looked pretty sharp in last nights debates, and I think he’ll pull out a win in New Hampshire as well.
nice job cowboy.
Very good interview. Though I’ve read very little from and about the emergent movement, I can’t help but think it’s just another example of one generation trying to distinguish itself from others. Maybe this is necessary within a culture such as our where generations are so divided. Yet, I would really like to see the Church be a place where “one generation can laud the works of God to another”. Are there any “emergent churches” out there with a significant number of 80-year-olds, or are they all in my church?
@Shane: At the risk of putting words in Tony’s mouth, I would probably say he’s defining “relativism” in terms of deconstruction. That is, when Derrida made his famous (and often misunderstood) deconstructionist statement “There is nothing outside of the text”, he was essentially saying, there is no reality that is not interpreted by means of language. Therefore everything is interpretation, which means everything is relative. Thus the quote from NYWC, “I’m not trying to say that subjectivity is good, I’m saying it’s all there is.” I’m sure he talks about this in his book.
@Pistol: Short answer: Yes. Long answer: I think the stereotype of mainly young people being drawn to emergent is somewhat true, but not entirely. At a forum hosted by Tony Jones a couple of years ago, I met a 50+ year old college professor who was totally interested in emergent and we exchanged e-mails. So it’s out there, but you’re sure to find more older people in mainline denominations.